@article{oai:ohu-lib.repo.nii.ac.jp:00002108,
 author = {島田, 敏尚 and 大坊, 元二 and 鈴木, 陽典 and 熊澤, 友子 and 寺田, 秀雄 and 高橋, 和裕 and シマダ, トシナオ and ダイボウ, モトジ and スズキ, ヨウスケ and クマザワ, トモコ and テラダ, ヒデオ and タカハシ, カズヒロ and SHIMADA, Toshinao and DAIBOU, Motoji and SUZUKI, Yousuke and KUMAZAWA, Tomoko and TERADA, Hideo and TAKAHASHI, Kazuhiro},
 issue = {1},
 journal = {奥羽大学歯学誌},
 month = {Mar},
 note = {P(論文), In the present study, we investigated the diagnostic ability of AGFA dental film (A) compared with INSIGHT dental film (I), depending on the basic photograph characteristic test. The results were as follows : 1. The diagnostic point of the x-ray photograph focused on the structures of the dental root area. 2. The judging standard of the X-ray nlm reading confirmed because the contrast is a main factor. 3. The INSIGHT film was more acceptable that the photographic contrast was seen clearly on blue base background. 4. There was no difference in the quantity of INSIGHT or AGFA film, due to the clinical experience of the user.},
 pages = {41--45},
 title = {口内法X線フィルムの臨床的評価},
 volume = {30},
 year = {2003}
}